preventionOS
Compare

Prevention software vs custom Salesforce builds.

Some larger prevention organizations went down the Salesforce path: NPSP, custom objects, a partner-built training and reporting layer. The build is real software. It is also a major up-front investment, a long build cycle, and a maintenance contract that grows over time. preventionOS is built for prevention from day one across the seven verticals (child abuse and neglect, bullying, youth violence, sexual violence, intimate partner violence, suicide, and elder abuse prevention).

Capability matrix

Custom Salesforce, line by line, against preventionOS.

Salesforce is the right tool for CRM, donor management, and grants. Layering prevention workflows on top is real engineering, and it stays a maintenance project. preventionOS is shaped for the prevention work itself.

Time to first value
Long build cycles. Discovery, requirements, design, build, UAT, training. Months before staff use it.
Live platform. Configuration to your curricula and demographics, then your team is in the system.
Implementation cost
Significant up-front build, scoped through a partner. Then ongoing maintenance.
Per-organization pricing by size and module mix. No build, no consultancy retainer to keep the lights on.
Fit to prevention workflows
CRM-shaped at the core. Prevention workflows (multi-curriculum, facilitator lifecycle, pre/post, coalition rollups) are custom objects layered on top.
Built for prevention from day one. Multi-curriculum, facilitator lifecycle, pre/post, and coalition rollups are first-class.
Maintenance over time
Curriculum changes, funder questions, and new state requirements all need partner work. Hours add up every year.
Platform updates regularly across the field. Roadmap is public. Improvements ship to every org on platform.
Vendor dependency
The org becomes dependent on the implementation partner. Turnover on the partner side is your risk.
One vendor, one platform, one support contact. Full data exports in human-readable formats anytime. Your data, your access.
Reporting
Salesforce reports work for CRM data. Prevention funder reports usually require custom report types and dashboards built and maintained by the partner.
Funder dashboards and impact reports built into each module. Demographics, pre/post, certification status all aggregate cleanly.
Cross-org learning
Each Salesforce org is its own island. Curricula and templates do not travel between organizations.
Optional Research module gives your program team a cross-organization layer for shared curricula, templates, and evidence. Each program team runs its own tenant; the Research module is opt-in.
Total cost of ownership
Build cost + license cost + maintenance contract + the staff time managing the partner relationship.
Platform cost, scoped to size and module mix. No build, no maintenance retainer.
Why prevention organizations switch

Three reasons custom Salesforce stops paying off.

The maintenance bill grows.

Every curriculum change, every funder question, every stakeholder reporting update goes back through the partner. The maintenance retainer keeps growing while the platform itself does not get more useful.

The org depends on one partner.

Custom Salesforce builds usually live in a partner's head. When their team turns over, the institutional knowledge of how your prevention workflows work goes with them. The risk is real, and prevention orgs feel it.

CRM shape is not prevention shape.

Salesforce is a CRM. Prevention work is multi-curriculum cohorts, facilitator certification cycles, pre/post outcomes, coalition rollups, and configurable stakeholder exports. The mismatch shows up in every report and every change request.

Frequently asked

Moving prevention work off custom Salesforce.

We already invested in a custom Salesforce build. Should we walk away from it?
Not necessarily, and not all at once. Many prevention organizations on Salesforce keep using it for donor management, grants, and constituent CRM, and move the prevention workflows (training, certifications, pre/post, coalition rollups) onto preventionOS. The two stacks coexist. Salesforce stays the CRM; preventionOS becomes the operating system for the prevention work itself.
How does data migration from Salesforce work?
Participant records, training history, certification dates, pre/post results, and demographic data all migrate from Salesforce. The custom objects you and your partner built get mapped to the standardized prevention shape preventionOS uses, so historical reporting stays consistent.
What is the learning curve for staff used to Salesforce?
Most staff find preventionOS faster to use than the custom Salesforce build, because the workflows match the way prevention work actually runs instead of a CRM the partner shaped to fit. Coordinators, facilitators, and program managers are usually working in the platform inside their first session.
What stays the same after we switch?
Your curricula, your facilitators, your participants, your funders, and your reporting cadence. What changes is that you stop paying the partner every time a curriculum changes, a funder asks a new question, or a stakeholder reporting requirement updates. Full data exports in human-readable formats are available anytime. Your data, your access.
What is the ROI of moving prevention work off custom Salesforce?
Two clear lines. First, the partner maintenance contract goes away. The recurring spend just to keep the custom build working drops out. Second, the staff time managing the partner relationship comes back, plus the time saved on every change request that used to take weeks.
Talk pricing

See pricing without a custom build.

Book a 30-minute call. We will look at what your custom build does today, walk through preventionOS on the same workflows, and share honest pricing for your size and module mix.

Book a pricing call →